-
1 sake
-
2 sake
sake n1 ( purpose) for the sake of pour [principle, prestige, nation] ; for the sake of clarity, for clarity's sake pour la clarté ; for the sake of argument à titre d'exemple ; to kill for the sake of killing tuer pour le plaisir de tuer ; to do sth for its own sake faire qch pour le plaisir ; peace/production for its own sake la paix/la production pour la paix/la production ; for old times' sake en souvenir du bon vieux temps ;2 ( benefit) for the sake of sb, for sb's sake par égard pour qn ; for my/her/their sake par égard pour moi/elle/eux ; for all our sakes dans notre intérêt à tous ; I'm telling you this for your own sake c'est pour ton bien que je te dis cela ;3 (in anger, in plea) for God's/heaven's sake! pour l'amour de Dieu/du ciel! -
3 sake
[seɪk]1) (purpose)for the sake of — per [principle, prestige]
for the sake of clarity for clarity's sake per chiarezza; for the sake of argument per il gusto di discutere; to kill for the sake of killing uccidere per il gusto di uccidere; to do sth. for its own sake fare qcs. per il piacere di farlo; for old times' sake — in ricordo dei vecchi tempi
2) (benefit)for the sake of sb. o for sb.'s sake per amore di qcn.; for their, your sake per il loro, tuo bene; for all our sakes — nell'interesse di noi tutti
3) (in anger, plea)for God's, heaven's sake! — per l'amor di Dio, del cielo!
* * *[seik]* * *[seɪk]1) (purpose)for the sake of — per [principle, prestige]
for the sake of clarity for clarity's sake per chiarezza; for the sake of argument per il gusto di discutere; to kill for the sake of killing uccidere per il gusto di uccidere; to do sth. for its own sake fare qcs. per il piacere di farlo; for old times' sake — in ricordo dei vecchi tempi
2) (benefit)for the sake of sb. o for sb.'s sake per amore di qcn.; for their, your sake per il loro, tuo bene; for all our sakes — nell'interesse di noi tutti
3) (in anger, plea)for God's, heaven's sake! — per l'amor di Dio, del cielo!
-
4 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
-
5 talk
talk [tɔ:k]parler ⇒ 1 (a), 1 (c), 2 (a), 2 (b) discuter ⇒ 1 (a) s'entretenir ⇒ 1 (a) causer ⇒ 1 (b) conversation ⇒ 3 (a) discussion ⇒ 3 (a), 3 (d) causette ⇒ 3 (a) entretien ⇒ 3 (a) exposé ⇒ 3 (b) paroles ⇒ 3 (c) racontars ⇒ 3 (e) négociations ⇒ 4∎ to talk to sb parler à qn;∎ to talk with sb parler ou s'entretenir avec qn;∎ to talk of or about sth parler de qch;∎ we sat talking together nous sommes restés à discuter ou à bavarder;∎ she didn't talk to me the whole evening elle ne m'a pas dit un mot de la soirée;∎ to talk in signs/riddles parler par signes/par énigmes;∎ they were talking in Chinese ils parlaient en chinois;∎ I've been teaching my parakeet to talk j'ai appris à parler à mon perroquet;∎ to talk for the sake of talking parler pour ne rien dire;∎ that's no way to talk! en voilà des façons de parler!;∎ they no longer talk to each other ils ne se parlent plus, ils ne s'adressent plus la parole;∎ who do you think you're talking to? non, mais à qui croyez-vous parler?;∎ don't you talk to me like that! je t'interdis de me parler sur ce ton!;∎ to talk to oneself parler tout seul;∎ he likes to hear himself talk il s'écoute parler;∎ I'll talk to you about it tomorrow morning (converse) je vous en parlerai demain matin; (as threat) j'aurai deux mots à vous dire à ce sujet demain matin;∎ it's no use talking to him, he never listens! on perd son temps avec lui, il n'écoute jamais!;∎ to talk of this and that parler de la pluie et du beau temps ou de choses et d'autres;∎ talking of Switzerland, have you ever been skiing? à propos de la Suisse, vous avez déjà fait du ski?;∎ they talked of little else ils n'ont parlé que de cela;∎ he's always talking big c'est un beau parleur;∎ now you're talking! voilà, c'est beaucoup mieux!;∎ you can talk!, look who's talking!, you're a fine one to talk! tu peux parler, toi!;∎ it's easy for you to talk, you've never had a gun in your back! c'est facile à dire ou tu as beau jeu de dire ça, on ne t'a jamais braqué un pistolet dans le dos!;∎ talk about luck! (admiring) qu'est-ce qu'il a comme chance!, quel veinard!; (complaining) tu parles d'une veine!∎ talk about lucky! tu parles d'un coup de bol!;∎ talk about a waste of time! tu parles d'une perte de temps!;∎ to talk through familiar one's hat or the back of one's neck or one's backside or vulgar one's arse dire des bêtises□ ou n'importe quoi□∎ you know how people talk les gens sont tellement bavards(c) (reveal secrets) parler;∎ to make sb talk faire parler qn;∎ we have ways of making people talk on a les moyens de faire parler les gens;∎ someone must have talked quelqu'un a dû parler(a) (language) parler;∎ to talk slang parler argot;∎ talk sense! ne dis pas de sottises!, ne dis pas n'importe quoi!;∎ now you're talking sense vous dites enfin des choses sensées;∎ to talk (some) sense into sb faire entendre raison à qn;∎ stop talking rubbish or nonsense! arrête de dire des bêtises!;∎ esp American familiar he can talk the talk but can he walk the walk? est-ce qu'il est aussi doué pour agir que pour parler?□∎ to talk business/politics parler affaires/politique3 noun(a) (conversation) conversation f; (discussion) discussion f; (chat) causette f, causerie f; (formal) entretien m;∎ to have a talk with sb about sth parler de qch avec qn, s'entretenir avec qn de qch;∎ I'll have a talk with him about it je lui en parlerai;∎ we had a long talk nous avons eu une longue discussion;∎ can we have a little talk? je peux vous parler deux minutes?;∎ that's fighting talk! c'est un défi!(b) (speech, lecture) exposé m;∎ to give a talk on or about sth faire un exposé sur qch;∎ there was a series of radio talks on modern Japan il y a eu à la radio une série d'émissions où des gens venaient parler du Japon moderne(c) (UNCOUNT) (noise of talking) paroles fpl, propos mpl;∎ there is a lot of talk in the background il y a beaucoup de bruit ou de gens qui parlent(d) (speculative) discussion f, rumeur f;∎ most of the talk was about the new road il a surtout été question de ou on a surtout parlé de la nouvelle route;∎ there's some talk of building a concert hall (discussion) il est question ou on parle de construire une salle de concert; (rumour) le bruit court qu'on va construire une salle de concert;∎ there has been talk of it on en a parlé, il en a été question;∎ enough of this idle talk! assez parlé!;∎ he's all talk tout ce qu'il dit, c'est du vent∎ it's only talk ce sont des racontars, tout ça;∎ their behaviour is causing a lot of talk leur conduite fait jaser;∎ it's/she's the talk of the town on ne parle que de ça/que d'elle;∎ the wedding was the talk of the town on ne parlait que du mariage(negotiations) négociations fpl, pourparlers mpl; (conference) conférence f;∎ official peace talks des pourparlers mpl officiels sur la paix;∎ so far there have only been talks about talks jusqu'ici il n'y a eu que des négociations préliminaires►► talk show causerie f (radiodiffusée/télévisée), talk-show m∎ to talk to sb about sth parler de qch à qn;∎ there's an important matter I must talk to you about j'ai à vous parler ou entretenir d'une affaire importante;∎ the new model has been much talked about on a beaucoup parlé du nouveau modèle;∎ it gives them something to talk about ça leur fait un sujet de conversation;∎ this will give them something to talk about (gossip about) voilà quelque chose qui va les faire jaser;∎ to get oneself talked about faire parler de soi;∎ they were talking about going away for the weekend ils parlaient ou envisageaient de partir pour le week-end∎ we're not talking about that! il ne s'agit pas de cela!;∎ when it comes to hardship, he knows what he's talking about pour ce qui est de souffrir, il sait de quoi il parle;∎ when it comes to cars, he knows what he's talking about pour ce qui est des voitures, il connaît son affaire;∎ what are you talking about? (I don't understand) de quoi parles-tu?; (annoyed) qu'est-ce que tu racontes?;∎ you don't know what you're talking about! tu ne sais pas ce que tu dis!;∎ I don't know what you're talking about (in answer to accusation) je ne sais pas ce que vous voulez dire;∎ it's not as if we're talking about spending millions qui parle de dépenser des millions?;∎ how much are we talking about? il faut compter combien?, ça va chercher dans les combien?;∎ but I'm talking about a matter of principle! pour moi, c'est une question de principe!∎ I hate people who talk at me not to me je ne supporte pas les gens qui parlent sans se soucier de ce que j'ai à direpasser le temps à parler, parler sans arrêt;∎ they were still talking away at 3 a.m. ils étaient encore en grande conversation à 3 heures du matin∎ to talk the night away passer la nuit à parler(insolently) répondre;∎ to talk back to sb répondre (insolemment) à qn;∎ don't you talk back to me! ne me réponds pas (comme ça)!∎ to talk sb down réduire qn au silence (en parlant plus fort que lui/elle/ etc)(b) (aircraft) faire atterrir par radio-contrôle∎ the police managed to talk him down from the roof la police a réussi à le convaincre de redescendre du toit∎ to talk down to sb parler à qn comme à un enfant∎ to talk sb into doing sth persuader qn de faire qch;∎ she allowed herself to be talked into going elle s'est laissé convaincre d'y aller;∎ to talk oneself into a job (by trying to impress) obtenir un emploi grâce à son baratin;∎ you've just talked yourself into a job (by saying that) ce que vous avez dit là m'a convaincu et vous avez le poste(a) (problem, disagreement) débattre de, discuter de;∎ they managed to talk out the problem à force de discussions, ils sont arrivés à trouver une solution au problème∎ to talk out a bill = prolonger la discussion d'un projet de loi jusqu'à ce qu'il soit trop tard pour le voter avant la clôture de la séance∎ to talk sb out of doing sth dissuader qn de faire qch;∎ try to talk him out of it essayez de l'en dissuader;∎ to talk oneself out of trouble se tirer d'affaire grâce à son baratin;∎ talk yourself out of that one! vas-y, essaie de t'en sortir cette fois-ci!discuter ou débattre de;∎ let's talk it over discutons-en, parlons-en;∎ we'll have to talk the problem over il va falloir que l'on parle de ce problème;∎ to talk things over discuter(convince) persuader, convaincre;∎ to talk sb round to one's way of thinking amener qn à sa façon de penser ou à son point de vue;∎ I'm sure she can be talked round je suis sûr qu'on peut la convaincre(problem) tourner autour de;∎ I'm tired of just talking round the subject j'en ai assez de tourner autour de la questionvanter les mérites de, faire de la publicité pour;∎ to talk up sb's chances surestimer les chances de qn;∎ the Chancellor is trying to talk up the economy le Chancelier s'est montré optimiste pour tenter de redynamiser l'économie
См. также в других словарях:
The Art of Fiction — The Art of Fiction: A Guide for Writers and Readers is a nonfiction book by Ayn Rand, published posthumously. Edited by Tore Boeckmann, it was published by Plume in 2000, ISBN 0452281547. The book is based on a 1958 series of 12 four hour… … Wikipedia
The Seal of Confession — The Law of the Seal of Confession † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Law of the Seal of Confession In the Decretum of the Gratian who compiled the edicts of previous councils and the principles of Church law which he published about 1151,… … Catholic encyclopedia
The Highest Good — The Highest Good † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Highest Good We always act with a view to some good. The good is the object which all pursue, and for the sake of which they always act , says Plato (Republic, I, vi). His disciple… … Catholic encyclopedia
The public scandal of the Dreyfus Affair — The scandal over falsely accused Alfred Dreyfus grew into a public scandal of unprecedented scale. Almost the entire french nation became divided between pro and anti Dreyfusards.Attitude of the pressAgainst this odious campaign was set in motion … Wikipedia
The Seven Liberal Arts — The Seven Liberal Arts † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Seven Liberal Arts The expression artes liberales, chiefly used during the Middle Ages, does not mean arts as we understand the word at this present day, but those branches of… … Catholic encyclopedia
The Carmelite Order — The Carmelite Order † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Carmelite Order One of the mendicant orders. Origin The date of the foundation of the Order of Our Lady of Mount Carmel has been under discussion from the fourteenth century to … Catholic encyclopedia
The Thirty Years War — The Thirty Years War † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Thirty Years War The Thirty Years War (1618 48), though pre eminently a German war, was also of great importance for the history of the whole of Europe, not only because nearly all… … Catholic encyclopedia
The Man from London — The Man from London … Wikipedia
Search for the Truth (video) — Search for the Truth (also known by the name Jesus Christ/Joseph Smith in its DVD form) is an anti Mormon video produced by Tri Grace Ministries. The video begins with the claim that Jesus Christ and Joseph Smith Jr. were “two of the worlds most… … Wikipedia
The Wealth of Nations — An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations is the magnum opus of the Scottish economist Adam Smith. It is a clearly written account of economics at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, as well as a rhetorical piece written… … Wikipedia
The Idler (1758–1760) — This article is about the 18th century series of essays. For other publications called The Idler, see The Idler (disambiguation). The Idler was a series of 103 essays, all but twelve of them by Samuel Johnson, published in the London weekly the… … Wikipedia
